The New England Anti Vivisection Society - 1519 Words

â€Å"Would we imprison our children in cages too small for them to move? Would we violate our sisters and steal their babies? Would we deliberately infect our friends with diseases and leave them untreated? Of course not so why would we do the same to animals? We must abandon the archaic and incorrect boundary of â€Å"human,† which we use to justify the ongoing massacre of billions of beings (PETA)†. According to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society, â€Å"There is an estimate of 100 million animals that are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in laboratory testing every year. â€Å"Most animals in laboratories never will experience fresh air or sunshine, only bars and concrete sound more like a prison well that’s just the beginning of what animal’s experience. There are few facilities that provide some outside caging, and they typically rotate the animals, giving them limited and infrequent amounts of time outdoors. Standard lab conditions, suc h as small, crowded cages, lack of enrichment, loud noises, and bright lights are all known to create stress in animals. When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a fine line between our needs and taking advantage of these animals just because we consider them to be inferior (NEAVS).† There are approximately 2,900 animals that are abused, and tortured and eventually killed every single hour. Millions of animals each year live in terrible conditions and are forced to endure inhumane treatment all in the name of research. Here are onlyShow MoreRelatedAwa Case Study1174 Words   |  5 Pagesinspector will visit every month for another year. For a third offence the facility is shut down and the company that owns the facility will owe $50.000. The money companies pay will be split between the USDA, animal shelters, and toward research for new ways to test products. The USDA will get 40% of each fine to help pay their employees. Animal shelters will get 30% to keep them open and help house the animals that are taken from the facilities that violated the laws. The last 30% will go toward aRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Rights1601 Words   |  7 Pagescalled Elixir Sulfanilamide. When the medicine was released the company was unaware that the substance was harmful because the drug was not tested, causing more than one hundred people to died. After this accident the government made animal testing of new drugs mandatory. In the twentieth century, animal experimentation was performed on a variety of species, including dogs, cats, pigs, and monkeys. The main source was the primates because it was believed that they were valuable test subjects becauseRead MoreRight For Hunt Vs. Animal Rights955 Words   |  4 PagesEvery year in the U.S., over 25 million animals are used in biomedical experimentation, product and cosmetic testing, and science education. In a piece published by the New England Anti-Vivisection Society, Harm and Suffering, addresses the institutionalized abuse animals face through vivisection. The New England Anti-Vivisection Society (NEAVS) is a national animal advocacy organization based in Boston, Massachusetts. It is dedicated to the ending of the use of animals in study and testing. Those attractedRead MoreMedical Research On Animal Testing1736 Words   |  7 PagesErasistratus. What exactly is medical research on animals? When we take a deeper look into the experiment that are preformed we can conclude that animals are a living model of humans in these laboratories. It is a necessity to harm and test animals with new drugs in order to market them in the medical industry to aid human illnesses. In order to better comprehend and regulate drugs one must understand what medical research on animals is described as and its benefits to pharmaceutical companies for humansRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Not Be Banned1578 Words   |  7 PagesAccording to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society on their research from Harm and Suffering, â€Å"[e]very year in the U.S., over 25 million animals are used in biomedical experimentation, product and cosmetic testing, and science education.† Animal testing has been traced back to Aristotle and Erasistratus who according to Rachel Hajar from Animal Testing and M edicine, â€Å"[were] [e]arly Greek physician-scientists† that have conducted animal experiments. Another physician who has performed animal experimentationsRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Be Banned1056 Words   |  5 Pages When using cosmetics or common house cleaning products many do not realize that they are supporting animal cruelty. Animal testing is among the most disturbing experiments being done today. Vivisection is the practice of animal experimentation. It can include administering drugs, infecting animals with diseases, poisoning for toxicity testing, brain damaging, maiming, blinding, and other painful invasive procedures. Animal testing has protocols that cause severe suffering such as long-term socialRead MoreImportance Of Animal Testing1726 Words   |  7 Pagesadoption of domestic pets that fueled interest in an anti-vivisection movement, England primarily. Adopting domestic pets culminated in the founding of the Society for the Protection of Animals Liable to Vivisection in 1875. This was followed by the formation of similar groups. Queen Victoria, of England, was an early opposer of animal testing in her country, as said in a 1875 letter written by her private secretary. Soon after t hat, the anti-vivisection campaign became strong enough and pressured lawmakersRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Be Banned2223 Words   |  9 Pagesanimals, there are better methods of testing consumer products. Scientists have to test the drugs on the animal before they can test the product on humans. If the drug is dangerous or toxic, it could initially harm the animals. Some scientists do a vivisection, which basically means operating on live animals for the purpose of research. This results in injury or even death to the animals. The US Department of Agriculture stated that in 2010 97,123 animals suffered in experiments when not given anesthesiaRead MoreAnimal Testing Is An Act Of Animal Cruelty952 Words   |  4 Pageswalks past their cage. After surviving lives of pain, isolation, and horror, near to all of them will be killed. Although animal testing brings more products and more medical discoveries, it should still be considered an act of animal cruelty. Vivisection—the practice of performing operations on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research— is one of the worst forms of animal abuse in our culture. Within-laboratory walls, what can occur to animals have no limits. ImagineRead MoreEssay on Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?2175 Words   |  9 Pagesvivisection Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical? â€Å"It is a simple fact that many, if not most, of today’s modern medical miracles would not exist if experimental animals had not been available to medical scientists. It is equally a fact that, should we as a society decide the use of animal subjects is ethically unacceptable and therefore must be stopped, medical progress will slow to a snail’s pace. Such retardation will in itself have a huge ethical ‘price tag’ in terms of continued